Hi All:
I received a note from Craig Thornber, the historian who originally photographed the tomb inscription:
Dear Pamela
Thanks for copying me in on this correspondence. Here are the full size images. As you can see from their titles they were taken nine years ago. At that time I had a 5 megapixel compact camera. Technology has moved on and now I use a digital SLR and have Adobe Photoshop CS5 for processing so better images may be possible. If I get the opportunity I will run over to Astbury and see what can be done.
My copy of Ormerod’s History of Cheshire is on CD from the Family History Society of Cheshire. They have produced in addition Earwaker’s History of East Cheshire. Full bibliographic details are shown on my Cheshire site but I reproduce them here:
The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, incorporated with a republication of King's Vale Royal and Leycester's Cheshire Antiquities, by George Ormerod, 2nd Ed., revised and enlarged by Thomas Helsby, Esq., published by George Routledge and sons, Ludgate Hill, London, 1882. This is now available from the Family History Society of Cheshire on CD ROM. A reprint of the work was published by Eric Morten of Didsbury.
East Cheshire Past and Present by J.P. Earwaker, London, 1877. This is widely regarded as the best work on East Cheshire of the 19th century. It is useful for family trees of landed families. .
Good luck with your research.
Craig Thornber
I would like to co curate Ada's profile as I am going to work with Craig further; I think he can be of great help procuring more on site information that we don't have access to. He's also a great historian of the Chesire families.
Did you post this info to the correct profile?
There are a lot of unmerged duplicates and separate discussions on the same topic.
I am getting confused. Can some merging be done "to" the Master profiles that already exist?
Can we keep to the one discussion? It is "very" hard to constantly scan for new threads ...
All help is muchly appreciated.
The Discussion is here
http://www.geni.com/discussions/136733
@ Ada de Warenne,Countess of Huntingdon is my 25th grt grandmother http://www.geni.com/path/Judy-Rice+is+related+to+Ada-de-Warenne?fro... this is my lineage Judy Rice
Thanks, Craig and I are having a very interesting email conversation. I want most to remain objective, as I don't "need" Ada in my family. But it's something interesting I just ran across, and it will be a great learning experience going through the process. I'm going to try to summarize the contents, post it, then move forward with more research questions which I will post. This is a great mystery, involving politics, land, lots of history, archeology, genealogy; the whole ball of wax. Stay tuned!
Erica,
1. The timeline seems fine so far. On the alternate profile I have posted documents. I'm using it as a template to work on from original sources.
I don't want it tangled up with whatever is attached to your MP. I'm doing this as my research grows and develops, but it's all in one place except for one pedigree. I'm isinglass the Legh family pedigree to show the relationship between the the Venables family and the Breretons. According to this pedigree, the Breretons are descendants of the Venables.
So back to Ada. A short version of a paper I'm going to write on this:
The Windsor MSS of 1588 pretty well identifies who and what are in the tombs called Ada de Huntingdon and Ralph de Brereton. Even the Rector of the church has sworn to it as well as local gentry.
Next item, why were they buried at St. Mary's Astbury? Because Ada's son Gilbert/Gilles Brereton was the Rector of this church at the time of the tomb was built and again in 1337 as per the document I uploaded. He was also rector of St. Oswalds 1297 so there's another record for his approximate life span fitting with someone born post 1250. The Venables family were his patrons. So that refutes all arguments " what were they doing there". My gut feeling is that is his tomb next to them, as per archaeological data, carved at a later date. The inscription done also at a later date may have been an attempt to identify them at the time of the manuscript. Why?
This is a few decades after the Dissolution of the religious houses in England. Many old abbeys and churches were burned to the ground for the lead on the roofs, the stone hauled off, windows sold, contents hauled off, records and books destroyed, tombs defaced, destroyed, and the land taken by the crown or sold to the highest bidder. Later, after Henry VIII died, and Elizabeth I was on the throne, families whose parishes these buildings were originally in were allowed to buy back the buildings as parish churches.
The shield above the inscription matches both Venables and Brereton. They were originally identical, Venables being blue with 2 bars and Brereton being Silver with 2 bars.
I have higher resolution photos of the tombs now from Craig. But the translation on the tomb is accurate, it's been translated many times; The English Heritage Trust did a restoration of the tomb and it's records agree with Thornber.