I find the <ABOUT> section of this profile on Nixon quite slanted and watered down. It would not pass a "wikipedia" test for balanced analysis.
One example:
Compare the Watergate section of what is written here on this profile to the wikipedia section.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal#Money_trail
This GENI bio has sections that try to cover-up Nixon's misdeeds by eliminating studies on concepts such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege '''executive privilege'''] that continue to haunt American constitutional government.
Also missing are the three important words: Kent State shootings. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings '''Kent State Shootings''']
Also missing is any reference to Nixon's anti-semitism revealed in his infamous White House tapes and in other studies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/2010/12/n...
Is it more important to include passages of how Richard courted Pat ?
Also: I respectfully contend that the core values of RMN were not those of the Quaker faith.
http://www.geni.com/path/Judy-Rice+is+related+to+Richard-Nixon-37th... i agree with you they should have written more about his passage with his wife Pat instead of how corrupt he really was what a crook