Hillary Rodham Clinton

Started by Daniel Cameron Boeggeman Jr on Friday, November 25, 2016
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

  • Photo by Gage Skidmore. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Via Wikimedia Commons at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hillary_Clinton_by_Gage_Skidmore_4_(cropped).jpg

Related Projects:

This discussion has been closed by an administrator.
Showing all 18 posts
11/25/2016 at 10:11 AM

I submitted Hillary Rodham Clinton, 67th U.S. Secretary of State as an imposter because of what she had done with her emails, what she had done to women that her husband had extra marital affairs, and for claiming to be an advocate for women's rights. This is not a political attack, this is a submission based on a compilation of facts.

Private User
11/25/2016 at 3:45 PM

I declined your request. Please leave politics for elsewhere.

11/28/2016 at 9:09 AM

Although I do agree with you, I choose not to get involved.

Private User
12/3/2016 at 8:19 AM

That would make her an ALLEGED criminal ... not an imposter. She is herself. You need to take that up with the FBI and not Geni (although you may want to wait until after January 😬)

Merry Christmas!

12/3/2016 at 3:38 PM

I received an email notification of my request being declined. I am confused. Maybe I requested to be a part of this discussion, maybe not, I don't remember.Maybe I left a comment, I don't remember that either, but I don't understand the decline or the reason why ... Or if it was even directed toward me. Would you please explain? Thank you.

Private User
12/4/2016 at 2:20 AM

Hi, Paula Jean Register Sandoval! The only denied request was Daniel's, when he requested to add Sec. Clinton to the "Imposters" project. You would have received a notification for this discussion if you follow Sec. Clinton's profile.

12/4/2016 at 6:35 AM

WOW. This is unreal. We can't even get away from Politics here on our favourite website? I hope that I am not related to Daniel ...This has to stop.

12/4/2016 at 7:07 PM

@ashleyodell Oh, ok, Ashley. Thanks for letting me know. I participate in political debate and discussions, but not here. Thanks for letting me know...I didn't think I had said anything.

Private User
12/4/2016 at 11:26 PM

Paula Jean Register Sandoval,
This is Geni the 'World Family Tree'.. Daniel Cameron Boeggeman Jr is one of your many cousins :-) : https://www.geni.com/path/Pamela-Mendes+is+related+to+Daniel-Camero.... According to Geni, both you and he are also related to me :-)).

12/12/2016 at 9:12 AM

I didnt mean it as a political attack, the election is done, I meant it with all bias aside, and I would've submitted Trump just as quickly. I submitted her because of what happened to Haiti, after the tsunami that hit there, and what happened subsequently through the Clinton foundation. That would be a broad interpretation of imposter, and this project is more narrowed to specific types, but I acknowledged it was a bad idea afterwards, especially given the timing and circumstances. Thats a reason completely unrelated to politics.

12/12/2016 at 9:13 AM

And the emails, unimportant though, I took it back, like I said.

Private User
12/13/2016 at 11:18 AM

Freedom of speech people. We may or may not agree with what is said, but ostracizing one another goes against what our ancestors created and bled for.

Private User
12/13/2016 at 11:43 AM

Freedom of speech people! I guess every land has the leaders the people deserve. Lol!

12/13/2016 at 12:43 PM

May I also add: Wow.. Geni is a website to build your family tree and meet relatives, right, and simply because I suggested something that does not fit your view of the world, you say "I hope I'm not related to Daniel", if I had submitted Trump though, you wouldn't have said a word. What needs to stop are the assumptions, I made it very clear that politics have nothing to do with it, if you had read my full statement, you would have seen that. All of this is redundant, and to argue on this website is pointless. We are distant family, if you disagree, at least be polite about it.

Private User
12/13/2016 at 1:40 PM

Yes Private User the majority voted for someone that did not give response like Marie Antoinette did. If you wish to win the people, you will speak to everyone not condemn women for not voting for a woman or calling hard working miners and farmers deplorables. You talk to everyone not just the rich states. That was Hilary's mistake and may this be a humbling moment.

Private User
12/16/2016 at 7:08 AM

Freedom of speech is alive and well in this Discussion! Speak your minds! 😊 What is not doing well is the request to add Hillary to a completely subjective list ... it's not going to happen ... get over it. ( 👈🏻 That's free speech)

12/16/2016 at 12:15 PM

Sooo... I acknowledged over a week ago it was a bad idea, due to the circumstances and passions running high, and... nobody is even talking about the request, or arguing it, because it's a silly thing to do with distant family... so... I dont think anyone has anything to get over...

12/19/2016 at 9:18 AM

Since the initial purpose of this discussion has been addressed, we are closing this discussion thread. Lets put politics aside and get back to doing genealogy.

Showing all 18 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion