Halvdan Svarte Gudrødson, Upplendingakonungur - @Halvdan Svarte Gudrødson, Upplendingakonungur

Tor Bjarne Olsen why did you leave out the last half of the curatornote?

Here is the whole note:
"Snorre: He was married with two Ragnhild, - Haraldsdotter and Sigurdsdotter.
Both had a son named Harald Halvdansson, - One died 10 years old and the other known as Hårfagre.

Historians disagree with this view and this is explained under Harald's bio."

It usually is bad practice not to include the whole text when you're quoting a short text.

I know what the hole note says, but in my Message I refer to what is in the profile of Halvdan The Black, not only what the note say.
You refer to Snorre in Your note but you do not take the essence of what Snorre say. He say that Ragnhild haraldsdotter died soon after her father and that her son died at the age of ten. This does not match what you locked in the profile, in the profile you make Ragnhild Haraldsdotter the main spouse to Halvdan The Black and make an opening for that she was the mother of Harald Fairhair, how is this possible when she died before her son was ten and her son Harald died at the age of ten. This make no sence. Open the profile of Halvdan The Black and make Ragnhild Sigurdsdotter his spouse. There are only one way to see what your doing to this profile, that is stopping everything that do not become Your ideas about history regarding this profile as you also have done to the profile of Harald Fairhair. This is not what a curator should do.
It is you who make a note that is incorrect of what Snorre says, not me. We can now see why you say the assumption you do regarding these two profiles Skip the info that do not fit the ideas you have and make that the truth.

Tor Bjarne, read the last sentence in the curatornote again, maybe you'll understand better. And after that you can start to read up what the historians have thought about Snorre's writings since early 1990's.

If you don't agree with their findings, please take your argument to them, since I'm just saying what the majority of the Nordic historians are writing since 1990. I have told you this before, and I'm reading most of the forums and journals their writing in. Still haven't seen you giving them any questions. Why not?